|
24/01/2013
|
|
Author: ACSA
|
|
The ACSA has published a document on the monitoring and control of food allergens, which includes activities in Catalonia in the period 2005-2010 about the management and control of food allergens. In a second part, ractions and results of monitoring programs and allergen control carried out by the competent authorities in Catalonia. And finally, this document includes training and information activities for the food industry and allergic and intolerant population. Monitoring and Control of Food Allergens in Catalonia
|
|
16/01/2013
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
Following a request from the European Commission, the Panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) derived dietary reference values for energy, which are provided as average requirements (ARs) of specified age and sex groups. More info
|
|
11/01/2013
|
|
Author: Elika
|
|
Elika has developed this food allergy and intolerance infographic to explain what they are, which foodstuffs and ingredients cause them and which good practice should be carried out to eliminate the food or ingredient in the diet so as to avoid an allergy or intolerance. Food Allergy and Intolerance Infographic
|
|
21/11/2012
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
The inventory presented in this report describes the past and current scientific activities of EFSA addressing directly or indirectly bee risk assessment, risk mitigation and monitoring. To perform this work, the Emerging Risks Unit coordinated an internal Task Force including staff from the Pesticides, Animal Health and Welfare, Genetically Modified Organisms, Plant Health, Scientific Assistance Support and Emerging Risks Units and from the Communications Directorate. Up to September 2012, a total of 355 scientific outputs (published/unpublished yet: 344/11), and a number of news stories and a video on bees, were identified from the Pesticides (311/7), Animal Health and Welfare (0/1), Genetically Modified Organisms (29/0) and the Plant Health (2/0) Units and Panels and from the Scientific Assistance Support (2/1) and the Emerging Risks (0/2) Units. However, the majority of these outputs (89.6%) were conclusions on the peer review of pesticide active substances and opinions on applications for the approval of regulated genetically modified products. Among the 355 identified scientific outputs, 14 outputs (0.4%) focused on bees and were predominantly in the areas of pesticide risk assessment and monitoring. In addition, three external scientific activities between EFSA, Anses and OECD on bee issues were identified. The first EFSA scientific outputs on bee issues were published in 2004 and their number has increased progressively over time, but particularly after 2008 (23% published between 2004-2007 and 77% between 2008-2012). The Task Force will use this inventory to conduct a data gap analysis and make further recommendations in terms of research needs and future work at EFSA on bees in a second report. Full report
|
|
19/09/2012
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
The objective of the Pilot study for Assessment of Nutrient intake and food Consumption Among Kids in Europe (PANCAKE) project was to develop, test, and evaluate tools and procedures for a future harmonised pan-European food consumption survey (EU Menu) among infants, toddlers, children (up to ten years), and breastfeeding women. Full report
|
|
12/09/2012
|
|
Author: ELIKA
|
|
This article clarifies the meaning and use of the values used as a reference when assessing nutritional risk.
|
|
|
|
26/07/2012
|
|
Author: ELIKA
|
|
This article summarizes information on food allergies in the Book of Allergic Diseases recently published by the BBVA Foundation, which is mainly based on the Allergology Treaty of the Spanish Society of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (SEAIC) published in 2007. Furthermore, this article also includes information on food intolerances.
|
|
|
|
22/06/2012
|
|
During the Food Safety week, FSA has communicated new research showing that some people are taking more risks with food safety as they try to save money and make their meals go further. The research showed that most of those questioned (97%) believed the cost of their typical shopping basket has gone up significantly in the last three years, with half of these (47%) trying to make better use of leftover food. However, a third of people were more likely to judge when food is safe to eat by its smell, look or how long it’s been stored, rather than by the 'use by' date, while others are keeping leftovers for longer than the recommended limit of two days in the fridge. The FSA’s advice on leftovers and “use by” dates is: - If you are going to store leftovers in the fridge, cool them as quickly as possible, ideally within 90 minutes. Cover them, get them in the fridge and then eat them within two days.
- Make sure your fridge is operating at the correct temperature – it should be below 5°C.
- You can also freeze your leftovers, but cool them first to minimize temperature fluctuation in your freezer. They can be safely stored in the freezer almost indefinitely, but the quality will deteriorate gradually with time, so it’s best to eat them within three months.
- Make sure you defrost frozen leftovers properly before using them. If you’re going to cook them straightaway use a microwave. If you don’t have a microwave, defrost them in the fridge overnight.
- Eat leftovers within 24 hours of defrosting and do not refreeze again. The only exception to this is if you are defrosting raw food, such as meat or poultry, which can be refrozen once it has been cooked.
- Cook leftovers until steaming hot throughout.
- Follow rigorously “Use by” in order to avoid food became unsafe with bugs like E.coli and salmonella, which don’t cause food to smell off, so food could look and smell fine but still be harmful.
- Follow "best before" date relates to food quality and nutritional aspects.
Food safety on a budget research FSA advice on leaftovers and shopping attitudes
|
|
23/05/2012
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
This report presents the activities of the EFSA’s Emerging Risks Exchange Network together with a description of the Member States national activities on emerging risks detection. The Network met three times during 2011. The activities of the Network were focused on scientific and generic issues of importance for the exchange of relevant information for the detection of medium- and long-term emerging risks 2011 Report EREN
|
|
27/04/2012
|
|
Author: Elika
|
|
The Food Safety ranks as the third environmental priority for the twenty-first century, according to the United Nations Program for Environment. In a recently published report, the need to addressed a number os challenges is remarked, otherwise it may have consequences such as increased hunger and malnutrition, depletion of marine ecosystems, increased threat of zoonotic diseases and by another type of food contamination.
|
|
|
|
29/02/2012
|
|
Author: ELIKA
|
|
Brief summarazing the Era-net Susfood
|
|
|
|
17/02/2012
|
|
The EFSA working group proposed a revised simplified framework for emerging risk identification including three main steps: - preliminary identification of priority emerging issues
- identification of appropriate data sources and data collection
- final evaluation and identification of emerging risks.
More info on Emerging Risk porposed methodology
|
|
20/10/2011
|
|
Author: ILSI
|
|
Summary report of a joint symposium held in october 2010 in nice, france organised by the ILSI europe food allergy task force in association with Europrevall. Food Allergy Risk Assessment
|
|
23/09/2011
|
|
Author: Europako Batzordea/Comisión Europea
|
|
Report from the Commission on food and food ingredients treated with ionising radiation for the year 2008. EC report on ioninised food
|
|
11/05/2011
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
The European Food Safety Authority has developed a practical approach for assessing potential risks arising from applications of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. Guidance is provided on: the physico-chemical characterisation requirements of engineered nanomaterials used e.g. as food additives, enzymes, flavourings, food contact materials, novel foods, feed additives and pesticides and; testing approaches to identify and characterise hazards arising from the nanoproperties. EFSA Opinion on Nanotechnology
|
|
20/04/2011
|
|
Author: ELIKA
|
|
Basic Info on Radioactivity in food (In Spanish)
|
|
|
|
12/04/2011
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
EFSA statement on the Safety of Irradiation of Food EFSA has published a statement providing a summary of the conclusions and recommendations on the Safety of Irradiation of Food of two scientific opinions of the Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) and the Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids (CEF) Panels adopted on September and November 2010, respectively. Concerning the safety assessment of irradiation of food, there are no microbiological risks for the consumer linked to the use of food irradiation and its consequences on the food microflora. EFSA statement on Food Irradiation
|
|
29/10/2010
|
|
Author: FSA
|
|
The aims of this FSA report were to identify: 1) The impact that climate change may have upon nutrition 2) The effects that climate change may have upon food safety 3) The impact that food & food waste has as a driver of climate change How responses to climate change may impact on nutrition and food safety. Climate Change Report
|
|
12/01/2010
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has completed the first ever review of the safety of 11 smoke flavourings used in the European Union. Based on EFSA’s work, the European Commission will establish a list of smoke flavouring products authorised for use in foods. List of opinions on smoking flovours Smoking flavours opinions
|
|
17/04/2009
|
|
Author: NZFSA
|
|
The New Zealand Food Safety Authority (NZFSA) has issued a review on human disease evidence associated with the consumption of raw milk and raw milk cheese. This review informs about the standard setting process, and aids the development of a risk communication strategy, a systematic assessment of the available morbidity and mortality evidence associated with consumption of raw milk and raw milk cheese.
|
|
|
|
11/03/2009
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) issued a statement on 4-methylbenzophenone in some breakfast cereals, based on literature searches, on data provided on analysis of
4-methylbenzophenone in food samples by the Belgian Federal Agency. For adults, the estimated exposure is unlikely to lead to a health concern, since the
estimated MoE is higher than 600. For children, the estimated exposure based on a
conservative scenario (high consumption of breakfast cereals, average concentration of
4-methylbenzophenone) is also unlikely to pose a health concern. However, for children,
based on the highly conservative scenario (high consumption of breakfast cereals, highest
concentration of 4-methylbenzophenone), the estimated MoE is below 600. Therefore a health
concern cannot be excluded in this case.
Based on the limited exposure data available and applying knowledge on the toxicity of a
similar substance, benzophenone, EFSA concludes that short term consumption of
contaminated breakfast cereals should not pose a risk to most people. However, if the use of
4-methylbenzophenone is to be continued, more data on occurrence of the substance in foods
should be provided as well as appropriate toxicity data corresponding to the level of exposure
for a full risk assessment.
|
|
11/03/2009
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
The European Food Safety Authority had issued an scientific opinion on potential risks arising from nanoscience
and nanotechnologies on food and feed safety. The Scientific Committee makes a series of recommendations; in particular, actions should be
taken to develop methods to detect and measure ENMs in food/feed and biological tissues, to
survey the use of ENMs in the food/feed area, to assess the exposure in consumers and
livestock, and to generate information on the toxicity of different ENMs.
|
|
|
|
22/09/2008
|
|
Author: FSAI
|
|
The Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) has issued a report providing an overview of current and potential applications of nanotechnology in the food
industry, which may equally be applied in the feed industry. The possible risks of nanotechnology,
together with the adequacy of the existing EU regulatory framework in the control of any potential
risks, are also examined with a view to determining what further legislative measures, if any, may be
necessary to safeguard food safety. Reflecting the deficiencies in the available information on the current applications of nanotechnology
in the agrifood sector and also the information needed to carry out a meaningful risk assessment; this
report contains a number of recommendations.
|
|
|
|
17/07/2008
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
The Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has issued an opinion on Microbiological Risk Assessment in feedingstuffs for food-producing animals for both public health and animal health. The Panel identified Salmonella spp. as the major hazard for microbial contamination of animal feed. Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Clostridium spp. are other hazards for which feed is regarded a far less important source. In addition, antimicrobial resistant bacteria, or antimicrobial resistance genes can be transmitted via feed. The report focuses on industrial compound feed as the feed group with the highest risk for becoming contaminated by Salmonella spp. Oil seed meal and animal derived protein are the major risk feed materials for introducing Salmonella contamination to feed mills and industrial compound feed. Data of Salmonella contamination in forage is scarce, and in most studies non-processed cereals are reported to have a low prevalence of Salmonella spp, while available data demonstrates that non-processed soybeans are often contaminated with Salmonella.
|
|
|
|
23/05/2008
|
|
Author: ILSI
|
|
The International Life Sciences Institute ILSI reviewed the criteria for identifying allergenic foods of public health importance. This criteria include clinical issues (diagnosis, potency of allergen, severity of reactions), population elements (prevalence, exposure) and modulating factors (food processing). In the framework, data providing evidence for these criteria are weighted according to quality, using a ranking derived from evidence-based medicine.
Review
|
|
01/08/2007
|
|
Author: Dirección Salud Pública - Gobierno Vasco
|
|
The Health Departament of the Basque Government has issued a report on GMOs in Basque Country´s commercialised foodstuffs. Five of the 98 analysed samples present GMOs, all of them authorised in Europe. The 3,2% of the samples do not fit the current European legislation on GMOs.
|
|
|
|
27/07/2006
|
|
Author: FSA
|
|
The British Food Safety Agency (FSA) has published a voluntary guide on food allergens. This document provides best practice advice to help food producers and retailers assess the risks of cross-contamination of a food product with an allergenic food or food ingredient and then to determine whether or not advisory labelling is appropriate. It is intended to give a generic overview of an approach to take in managing allergens and providing advisory labelling.
|
|
|
|
22/03/2006
|
|
Author: FAO/OMS
|
|
Model for nutrient risk
assessment that outlines the key considerations relevant to
establishing upper levels of intake for nutrient substances and to characterizing such risk.
|
|
|
|
29/03/2004
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
The scientific panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has published an opinion relating to the assessment of allergenic foods for labelling purposes. This panel concludes that there is a great deal of evidence to justify the obligatory declaration of allergenic components and their most common by-products, that could provoke an allergic reaction in sensitive individuals, in the list of ingredients of a product.
|
|
|
|
|