Risk Evaluation / Scientific Opinion
|
12/01/2010
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has completed the first ever review of the safety of 11 smoke flavourings used in the European Union. Based on EFSA’s work, the European Commission will establish a list of smoke flavouring products authorised for use in foods. List of opinions on smoking flovours Smoking flavours opinions
|
|
17/04/2009
|
|
Author: NZFSA
|
|
The New Zealand Food Safety Authority (NZFSA) has issued a review on human disease evidence associated with the consumption of raw milk and raw milk cheese. This review informs about the standard setting process, and aids the development of a risk communication strategy, a systematic assessment of the available morbidity and mortality evidence associated with consumption of raw milk and raw milk cheese.
|
|
|
|
11/03/2009
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
The European Food Safety Authority had issued an scientific opinion on potential risks arising from nanoscience
and nanotechnologies on food and feed safety. The Scientific Committee makes a series of recommendations; in particular, actions should be
taken to develop methods to detect and measure ENMs in food/feed and biological tissues, to
survey the use of ENMs in the food/feed area, to assess the exposure in consumers and
livestock, and to generate information on the toxicity of different ENMs.
|
|
|
|
22/10/2008
|
|
Author: FSAI
|
|
The Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) has issued a report providing a scientific opinion on the food safety implications most likely to be associated with land-spreading OA and OMI materials on agricultural land used for food production in Ireland against the background of current practices. The report reviews the current scientific knowledge in relation to the treatment, management and best practice options available to prevent and control known hazards to food safety related to land-spreading of these materials. The report also acknowledges opinions from other bodies on the level of compliance with these best practices and highlights the implications this may have for food safety.
|
|
|
|
22/09/2008
|
|
Author: OMS
|
|
This preliminary guidance, issued by the World Health Organization (WHO), is proposed as a first pragmatic approach until more data become available that allow a more detailed assessment. It has to be noted that currently there are large uncertainties involved in the assessment which preclude a more detailed guidance and emphasize the need for more data.
WHO is presently initiating action to develop a more thorough assessment through meetings of international scientists.
|
|
|
|
12/09/2008
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
The Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has issued a scientific opinion intending to identify,
from a public health perspective, the extent to which food serves as a source for the acquisition,
by humans, of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria or bacteria-borne antimicrobial resistance
genes, to rank the identified risks and to identify potential control options for reducing
exposure.
|
|
|
|
17/07/2008
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
The Scientific Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has issued an opinion on Microbiological Risk Assessment in feedingstuffs for food-producing animals for both public health and animal health. The Panel identified Salmonella spp. as the major hazard for microbial contamination of animal feed. Listeria monocytogenes, Escherichia coli O157: H7 and Clostridium spp. are other hazards for which feed is regarded a far less important source. In addition, antimicrobial resistant bacteria, or antimicrobial resistance genes can be transmitted via feed. The report focuses on industrial compound feed as the feed group with the highest risk for becoming contaminated by Salmonella spp. Oil seed meal and animal derived protein are the major risk feed materials for introducing Salmonella contamination to feed mills and industrial compound feed. Data of Salmonella contamination in forage is scarce, and in most studies non-processed cereals are reported to have a low prevalence of Salmonella spp, while available data demonstrates that non-processed soybeans are often contaminated with Salmonella.
|
|
|
|
22/03/2006
|
|
Author: FAO/OMS
|
|
Model for nutrient risk
assessment that outlines the key considerations relevant to
establishing upper levels of intake for nutrient substances and to characterizing such risk.
|
|
|
|
29/03/2004
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
The scientific panel on Dietetic Products, Nutrition and Allergies (NDA) of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has published an opinion relating to the assessment of allergenic foods for labelling purposes. This panel concludes that there is a great deal of evidence to justify the obligatory declaration of allergenic components and their most common by-products, that could provoke an allergic reaction in sensitive individuals, in the list of ingredients of a product.
|
|
|
Related documents
|
09/07/2010
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
Among Salmonella isolates, resistance to the commonly used antimicrobials of tetracycline, ampicillin and sulfonamide were frequently reported, and the proportion of resistant isolates in animals varied between 13%-47% in the reporting MS group. The resistance levels were higher in isolates from pigs and cattle compared to isolates from fowl. However, resistance to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid was highest among Salmonella isolates from Gallus gallus where it reached 18%-19%, at reporting MS group level. Antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter isolates was more common than in Salmonella isolates from food and animals. Resistance to ciprofloxacin and nalidixic acid varied between 34%-62% in the reporting MS group, and were highest among Campylobacter isolates from Gallus gallus and broiler meat. EFSA report on Antimicrobial Resistance
|
|
15/06/2010
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
EFSA conduct a review of the available information on the potential of transmission of the new (2009) nH1N1 human influenza pandemic virus to humans via food (pork and turkey meat and by-products). Report main conclusions: Swine are fully susceptible to the nH1N1 virus and may become infected after contact with infected humans, but no contact infections have been reported from swine to humans; The infection in swine is purely respiratory with no viraemia or virus dissemination to muscles or edible organs; - Low virus quantity contamination of food, including pork or pork products could be introduced by respiratory secretions containing nH1N1 virus during slaughter or handling;
- If ingested with food, the number of viable influenza virus particles will be reduced by acidic pH in the stomach and bile salts in the duodenum;
- There is no evidence that the human gastro-intestinal tract tissues can serve as a portal of entry or as a target organ for mammalian type A influenza viruses, including nH1N1;
- As oropharyngeal tissues are known ports of entry for mammalian influenza viruses, food that passes such tissues, if contaminated with nH1N1 virus, could hypothetically transmit an infection to humans; normal cooking procedures inactivate the virus in food;
- Commercially available disinfectants used for sanitation of food processing equipment rapidly destroy influenza viruses;
- Overall, food contaminated with nH1N1 influenza viruses does not appear to be a vehicle for infection in humans.
nH1N1 EFSA report
|
|
21/04/2010
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
This report summarized the 2008 results from the monitoring of veterinary medicinal product residues and other substances in food of animal origin in the Member States. A total of over 750,000 targeted samples were reported, of which less than 2,000 (0.27%) results were found to be over the legal limits. The frequency of non-compliant results (i.e. those which exceeded maximum limits) was similar to that found in previous years for most regulated veterinary medicines. EFSA Report
|
|
14/04/2010
|
|
Author: EFSA
|
|
CONTAM Panel has set a new TDI of 0.2 milligrams per kilogram of bodyweight. Due to this new TDI, It is recommended that the current SML for melamine from food contact materials is reconsidered in the light of the TDI of 0.2 mg/kg b.w. taking into account all sources of exposure. CONTAM Opinion
|
|
29/03/2010
|
|
Author: FSA
|
|
The report summarises data collected in 2007 from across the UK for a range of bacterial organisms of medical and veterinary importance in the UK. It brings together data on antimicrobial consumption, significant pathogens and their antimicrobial susceptibilities across the fields of human health, animal health and food. Report
|
|
30/11/2009
|
|
Author: FAO/OMS
|
|
INFOSAN issued a Information Note on the current state of knowledge and future actions by WHO and FAO on Bisphenol A . Daily dietary intakes, based on concentrations measured in food, vary widely, but have been estimated in Europe to be about 0.2μg/kg body weight in breast-fed babies, 2.3μg/kg body weight in formula-fed babies using non-PC bottles, 11μg/kg body weight in formula-fed babies using PC bottles, and 1.5μg/kg body weight in adults.EFSA noted that the conservative estimates of exposure were less than 30% of this TDI in all population groups considered, including infants fed using PC bottles. INFOSAN 5/2009
|
|
07/11/2008
|
|
Author: FSA
|
|
The Food Standards Agency (FSA) has issued new advice to pregnant women on daily caffeine consumption. The amount of caffeine in food and drink will vary, but as a guide each of these contains roughly 200mg or less of caffeine: 2 mugs of instant coffee (100mg each), 1 mug of filter coffee (140mg each), 2 mugs of tea (75mg each), 5 cans of cola (up to 40mg each), 2 cans of ''''energy'''' drink (up to 80mg each) or 4 (50g) bars of plain chocolate (up to 50 mg each).
COT Report
|
|
22/09/2008
|
|
Author: FSAI
|
|
The Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI) has issued a report providing an overview of current and potential applications of nanotechnology in the food
industry, which may equally be applied in the feed industry. The possible risks of nanotechnology,
together with the adequacy of the existing EU regulatory framework in the control of any potential
risks, are also examined with a view to determining what further legislative measures, if any, may be
necessary to safeguard food safety. Reflecting the deficiencies in the available information on the current applications of nanotechnology
in the agrifood sector and also the information needed to carry out a meaningful risk assessment; this
report contains a number of recommendations.
|
|
|
|
17/07/2008
|
|
Author: ACSA
|
|
The Catalonian Food Safety Agency (ACSA) has issued a brief on Bisphenol A summarizing any relevant information about this organic compound.
|
|
|
|
23/05/2008
|
|
Author: ILSI
|
|
The International Life Sciences Institute ILSI reviewed the criteria for identifying allergenic foods of public health importance. This criteria include clinical issues (diagnosis, potency of allergen, severity of reactions), population elements (prevalence, exposure) and modulating factors (food processing). In the framework, data providing evidence for these criteria are weighted according to quality, using a ranking derived from evidence-based medicine.
Review
|
|
01/08/2007
|
|
Author: Dirección Salud Pública - Gobierno Vasco
|
|
The Health Departament of the Basque Government has issued a report on GMOs in Basque Country´s commercialised foodstuffs. Five of the 98 analysed samples present GMOs, all of them authorised in Europe. The 3,2% of the samples do not fit the current European legislation on GMOs.
|
|
|
|
03/07/2007
|
|
Author: FSANZ
|
|
The Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) has issued a Scientific Evaluation of Pasteurisation for Pathogen Reduction in Milk and Milk Products. It is concluded that pasteurisation continues to be a very effective public health measure, with a reasonable margin of safety. Though it is recognised that there are still some gaps in the data for some organisms and that there are other forms (eg spores) or products (eg toxins) of some species that can withstand pasteurisation.
|
|
|
|
27/07/2006
|
|
Author: FSA
|
|
The British Food Safety Agency (FSA) has published a voluntary guide on food allergens. This document provides best practice advice to help food producers and retailers assess the risks of cross-contamination of a food product with an allergenic food or food ingredient and then to determine whether or not advisory labelling is appropriate. It is intended to give a generic overview of an approach to take in managing allergens and providing advisory labelling.
|
|
|
|
27/07/2006
|
|
Author: AFSSA
|
|
The French Food Safety Agency (AFSSA) has published a survey, summarizing alerts during last five years, concerning the veterinary use of antibiotics, the antimicrobial resistance and its impact on the human health. The most used antibiotics in France with veterinary ends, were the tetracyclines. On this report, we find several recommendations as developing a guide of antibiotics use, training veterinarian staff and advicing to avoid the automedication.
|
|
|
|
01/05/2005
|
|
Author: NDSC
|
|
The National Disease Surveillance Centre (NDSC), from Ireland, has published a report aimed at combating foodborne diseases. Its Food Handler Committee assesses the risks posed by infected food handlers, and it gives major recommendations in order to prevent the food contamination.
|
|
|
|
|